Fashion

This week it’s a Dress Monday

It’s a dress day for Cyndy and I this Monday. However much fashion designers and pundits are trying to wean us off dresses and back to separates, a dress is just so EASY. If it works, it works; there’s no wondering about proportion or matching top half to bottom half.

I am wearing a Jaeger dress in black and blue silk. I bought it last season, but it has proved the most useful dress ever and has come out for boardroom lunches, my QVC audition, our Dragon’s Den appearance and – literally – dozens of other events. It works alone, under a jacket or under a Chanel-style cardi. The black suede shoe-boots are from Office, the black bangle is from the Victoria & Albert Museum gift shop, and the necklace is from H&M.

Cyndy is rocking a fabulous dress in gold slub linen with cross-over bodice, by Apanage. Those stunning platform sandals are from Zara and the statement glass beads are by Antica Murrina of Venice, but bought in Melbourne by her lovely husband as a gift.

 

Tara P-T and Justine T need to learn head-to-toe colour is not a good look

It is, I think, the belief that Big Occasions require us to step up with a Big Outfit that causes so many sartorial challenges for women. Of course, if your daughter or son (or grand-daughter or grandson or, indeed, stepdaughter/stepson) is the bride or groom, you do feel an obligation to make a big effort to look fabulous and not to let the side down in the photographs.

But, as we witnessed on Friday at the wedding of Kate and William, so many women seem to go into some kind of style frenzy, abandoning all their usual style sense and walking trance-like into style no-man’s land as a result.

There have been the obvious disasters like the Princess Royal (as predicted here) looking as if she had done a “Gone with the Wind” and had an outfit made from the curtains, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie (see previous blog), Sally Bercow sporting Liverpool barmaid chic, Ed Milliband’s partner Justine Thornton, who looked like Little Bo Peep who had fallen in the sheep dip. That navy satin outfit was, possibly, the worst there, even out-nastying the Princess Royal's Harvey's number.

 

It feels mean being horrid about Beatrice and Eugenie, but they really need help

It feels so mean taking pot-shots at Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie for the outfits they wore to the Royal Wedding – like shooting fish in a barrel. They are so young, so vulnerable and basically so sweet that the horrendous firestorm of fashion vitriol that has come their way for their choice of outfits and hats seems totally unfair. I have to put my hands up and confess that I was an early critic, condemning their clothes on Friday morning within seconds of first seeing them. The outfits by Vivienne Westwood and Valentino WERE terrible – overdone, overfussy, too old, ill-fitting and unflattering for their body shape. And those hats were beyond a joke. As has been observed, Beatrice’s hat was simply an abomination – a parody of a fascinator, as if the designer was playing a game to see how many types of trim could be piled on a single hat before someone shouted "the emperor has no clothes", while Eugenie’s mushroom-colour hat looked like a cross between a scarab beetle on steroids and a small spacecraft. You just wish fervently that some caring adult in their life would have had the good sense to take a look and say “noooooo”. But sadly both girls seem to have inherited their mother, the Duchess of York’s style DNA (which is, frankly, no style), and been allowed to go along to the designers to splash a great deal of cash while playing dress-up. I have seen girls clothed at Topshop or River Island on one-tenth of their budget, who looked 1,000 times better, because there was some underlying sense of what is age-appropriate and body-appropriate and either an innate sense of style, or someone who could guide them towards what made them look fabulous. PLEASE someone get the Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie a style adviser who can steer them away from these sartorial disasters before Prince Harry decides to walk up the aisle with Chelsy Davy.

 

The royals look fab, but what's with the uniform navy blue

The extended family of duchesses and princesses look, on the whole very chic. Notable among them is the Duchess of Kent who looks divine in pink, possibly by Bellville Sassoon, a favourite of hers. But at least five of them have decided to sport navy, which makes it look a little like it was colour themed.

Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice, who can always be relied on to look overdressed and trussed up, do not disappoint. They could do with adopting the maxim "less is more"...

 

A sea of lavender but some very chic hats

Not entirely surprising that Westminter Abbey is filling up with a sea of pastels. Most of the guests attending the wedding of Kate Middleton and Prince William are playing safe, though there are soSme very dramatic hats, including pretty fascinators on the heads of Williams's three Spencer cousins.

The fascinator question is fascinating. Vogue pronounced the fascinator vulgar and dead more than a year ago, and while some of the little feather confections are, indeed, vulgar and cheap.

 

Royal wedding fever? No, but we are looking forward to the outfits

Courtesy of The JC www.thejc.comI would be fibbing if I said I was excited about Friday’s royal wedding. Despite the best efforts of the newspapers, magazines, TV, radio and the blogosphere, all of which are trying to hype us into a state of dizzy anticipation, I am really finding it hard to muster any excitement. I wish Kate and Wills well. They have a lot riding on their slender young shoulders, and I imagine the day will be an adorable spectacle. And I really am looking forward to seeing Kate’s dress, though if she had 150 fairies weaving it from magic dust and silk spun by celestial worms and it was then studded with real diamond particles it couldn’t possibly live up to the breathless expectation of a waiting fashion commentariat. And who would envy Carole Middleton on this day in terms of her clothes? It is hard enough dressing well as a regular Mother of the Bride, when guests are scrutinising you to see whether your outfit lives up – or down – to their expectations, whether your hat is more amusing than amazing, whether you are causing a mutton alert, whether you are trying to outshine the bride, or are guilty of some other fashion solecism... But for this poor MoB, who has already been subject to all kinds of unpleasant innuendo because of her pre-marriage career as an air stewardess, it is not only guests and how she will look in the family photos that she has to worry about, it is the fashion writers and bloggers, their fingers poised above their keyboards to offer an instant verdict on whether she got her outfits (there will be more than one) right or horribly wrong. As for the rest of the key players, the Queen will, almost certainly, look charming and perfectly age-appropriate for her grandson’s wedding. Having emerged from a 25-year period when she looked irredeemably frumpy, she now regularly looks perfect for her age and her role in those exquisitely made and wonderfully flattering hats by London milliner Rachel Trevor-Morgan and those pretty dress-and-coat ensembles most often created by London couturier Stewart Parvin. The Princess Royal, on the other hand, can almost certainly be depended upon to look completely awful. This is the woman who, with a little styling and a new haircut, could look utterly stunning. But the bouffant, the bun and the unerring ability to choose unflattering and frumpy outfits, will inevitably ensure that she looks ugly and eccentric. How can anyone be so sartorially wrong, so much of the time. As a woman of similar age, build and colouring, who is also a fashion editor, fashion blogger and fashion website director, there is no job I crave more than to style the Princess Royal. If I am proved wrong on Friday and she looks as gorgeous as she has the potential to look, I will add seasoning and eat my favourite Nerida Fraiman hat... What are your fashion expectations for the Royal Wedding?

 

Leave Scarlett alone! She is allowed to be a real woman

Well, hold the front page, Scarlett Johannson is a real woman. Real, in the sense that – like most other women on the planet – she has a tummy.

 

Are we deluded by vanity sizing? Do we think we have a body like Gwynneth Paltrow?

Do we love vanity sizing because we feel better buying a smaller size than we believe we really need, or do we hate it because it is another type of deception practised by retailers?

It has become almost routine in the high street for brands to size garments up – i.e. manufacturing a size 10 and slapping a size 12 label (or in some cases, a size 14 label) on it, to lull customers into the fond belief that they are a size 10 when they are really a 14, or a size 16 when they are really a size 20.

 

We couldn't resist the Jaeger sale with up to 70% off

We feel like Christmas and our birthday have come at once. There is up to 70% off some of our absolute favourite pieces at Jaeger, and Cyndy and I have already placed our orders. I particularly love a classically cut tuxedo reduced from £225 to just £68.

 

Suddenly it's summer and What We Wear on Monday is a dress

[gallery]

With the weather having gone in one week from winter to summer barely stopping for spring (though I suspect we can expect some mixed spring weather later this week – and probably for the rest of April), I am rocking a full-on summery dress on this (still very warm) Monday.

It is a cream and brown tunic by Mimosa with – what I now see in the photograph, which I didn’t see with a naked eye – is a kind of skull print.